Master Thesis · IFIKK, University of Oslo · Spring 2013

Perceptual RepresentationContent, Constancies and Phenomenal Consciousness

The selected passages show the thesis treating phenomenal information as a problem about exclusion, structured alternatives, intrinsic unity, and definite perceptual content. Supervised by Einar Duenger Bohn.

The Chapter 4 Line

Chapter 4 begins from Lewis's Hypothesis of Phenomenal Information, then makes the central demand explicit in 4.2.1: excluded possibilities must form a structured quality space.

Lewis / HPIExperience is examined as a candidate source of information.
ExclusionInformation rules out alternatives.
Quality SpaceExcluded alternatives must form a structured field.
Map / IndexA structured map still needs a definite index.

Core Passages

The core move is concentrated in 4.2.1: phenomenal information cannot be a bare exclusion; it has to be structured as a quality space. Chapter 3's Case from Absence closes the sequence with the question the current research takes up.

01

Phenomenal information begins as modal exclusion

Chapter 4.1, thesis pp. 79-80

Chapter 4 starts from Lewis's Hypothesis of Phenomenal Information and keeps the difficult part: information excludes alternatives.

The hypothesis of phenomenal information is the idea that phenomenal consciousness is informative. (…) According to David Lewis, there is an important hypothesis in this direction, which he calls 'The genuine hypothesis of phenomenal information,' which 'treats information in terms of elimination of possibilities' (Lewis, 1990, p. 94). (…) Note that while Lewis defines this genuine hypothesis of phenomenal information as necessarily excluding materialism, one need not do so. (…) I conjecture that when a space of possible representations, the 'map,' is indexed by the subject as a whole, then perception constitutively involves phenomenal information.
Context

Lewis, Lycan, and Hintikka frame the discussion, but the central move is direct: phenomenal presence is treated as a way alternatives are excluded for a subject.

02

Quality space makes the excluded field structured

Chapter 4.2.1, thesis pp. 82-85

This is the hinge section: if information excludes possibilities, phenomenal character demands a structured quality space, not a bare list of alternatives.

Each phenomenal character constitutively excludes a certain range of possibilities, and the possibilities that each phenomenal character excludes is structured according to difference and similarity relations. (…) Notice that a quality space is not just a set of discriminations, but a structured set of discriminations. (…) The structured set of information gives rise to many dimensions along which particular discriminations are related according to similarity and difference relations.
Context

Quine, Chalmers, Shoemaker, and Churchland stand behind the section. The important move is the demand itself: phenomenal information must be a structured space of alternatives if it is to explain phenomenal character.

03

Integrated information is the intrinsic-unity candidate

Chapter 4.2.2, thesis pp. 86-89

IIT enters because the thesis needs a principled answer to what makes many discriminations one intrinsic point of view.

According to Tononi's theory, there are two aspects that make the phenomenal experiences what they are. First, phenomenal experiences are rich in information. They are informative. Second, this information is integrated. (…) What is needed is ultimately 'an intrinsic point of view associated with the camera chip as a whole'. (…) There is no objective measure that uniquely settles which states should be grouped together; that is, there is no intrinsic measure of which alternative representations are relevant, and which are not.
Context

The photodiode and camera examples show why many discriminations do not yet amount to one point of view. The issue is unity, not quantity.

04

The map is not yet the index

Chapter 4.3, thesis pp. 89-95

The thesis becomes concrete here: a perceptual episode is a definite coordinate in a structured space, not a free-standing actual item.

The 'map' part in the above example is the structured space of possible representations. (…) When Churchland speaks of indexing he means the precise way in which several such constancies are combined in a definite perceptual representational content. (…) The relation between 'map' and 'indexing' inherently appeals to structural information because information is understood here as the exclusion of possibilities; the map is understood as a structured set of possibilities, and the indexing is understood as the determination of one among many possibilities. (…) What this shows is that there are some exotic colors (phenomenal characters!) that figure in our color space that we are not even aware of, or worse yet, might consider impossible - such as 'impossibly dark yellow' and 'hyperbolic orange' (P. M. Churchland, 2005, pp. 548, 552). (…) The nature of the indexing remains mysterious and incomplete on MIMP.
Context

The face-constancy example makes indexing concrete as a coordinate across many activated constancies. The chimerical-color example is especially useful because it shows that even normally inaccessible regions of a representational space can help define the space that gives actual perceptions their value.

05

The silent neuron as ontological influence?

Chapter 3.3.2, thesis p. 65

The Case from Absence poses the silent-neuron question in perceptual terms: an inactive-but-present constancy and a congenitally absent one involve the same actual activity, yet do not contribute to content in the same way.

Consider the difference between a born blind person and an individual with normal vision staring into a dark or empty room. One might say that the person born blind sees nothing. The person with normal vision might also happen to see nothing. However, they do not see nothing in the same way. (…) One might claim that the person with normal vision represents an absence of visual content because he or she has certain visual constancies that are currently inactive. However, these very same visual constancies are also inactive when the person with normal vision sleeps in dreamless sleep, and yet in that case we would not similarly say that he or she represents the absence of visual content. (…) Thus, one may wonder what is required for an inactive constancy to enter positively into the perceptual representational content as an absence. What is necessary for being aware of absences in this way?
Context

The 2026 abstract's operational case — a silent neuron, able to fire but not firing, versus an absent one — appears here in IIT-inspired perceptual terms: the inactive constancy versus the congenitally absent one, with dreamless sleep as the control.